If you’re on my page, you probably (a) identify as a high achiever, and (b) likely also struggle with either people pleasing and/or perfectionism. Being a person unique to the combination of (a) and (b), there are also unique challenges that you also will face in the pursuit of your own goals. One of the uniqueness of high achieving people pleasers lies within the variables that stop them from doing the things that they want to do. These are somewhat different from other people, in that they are not present in all situations, but are present when a high achiever goes to pursue their own personal goals. These variables are ones that stop you from holding your goals and dreams to be sacred at all costs, they sow doubt, breed insecurity, and contribute to struggles with boundaries and burnout. So what is this “number one challenge” to pursuing personal goals? Let’s back up for a moment, otherwise “the big reveal” will fall quite a bit flat. What Our Approach to Achievement Tells Us What do high achievers do when they want to achieve something for purposes other than personal goals? In this instance, let’s think of achievement as a sort of accomplishment that others will be made aware of; this is something that will be viewed or evaluated by other people as part of the process of the achievement itself, and may or may not also be of interest to the person. Meaning, they probably otherwise wouldn’t do this “thing” unless it wasn’t part of something they are “supposed to do” (for whatever reason). For these external-facing achievement goals, my high achieving people pleasers will often get amped up for it (via excitement, frustration, annoyance, or perpetual anxiety; some underlying emotional motivation) and then hyper-focus on that task either in time spent or in mental energy spent (or both). They use much of their time, energy, and space to focus on this goal. When these high achievers are also people pleasing, they add another layer of latent stress of how the end product of the goal will be perceived by others, with perpetual rumination on this aspect. Sprinkle in some perfectionism? They then critique their goal – over and over again to the point of exhaustion – to ensure that both their progress and the end-result of their goal will be perceived as ‘good enough.’ These two extra layers of people pleasing x perfectionism therefore get use of whatever remaining time, energy, and space exists for these individuals at the end of each day. At this point, the person is really using a huge percentage of their mental pie chart to focus on this external-facing goal. This can be extremely exhausting for the person; however, a lot of my clients report that this is how they “motivate” themselves to “get the job done” and that they will, in fact, typically complete the task when it is approached from this vantage point. This, in turn, makes it difficult to try different approaches and strategies that might be more beneficial to their physical and emotional wellbeing, because they believe that the stress and self-doubt they put themselves through is part of the “key” to their success. BUT! There’s a Caveat Here… The problem is, typically high achievers approach goal setting in this way when they are specifically considering it to be “achieving something” and where this said achievement will be presented to or evaluated by others. The evaluation process itself doesn’t necessarily demand one self-deprecate, undermine one’s own abilities, or doubt oneself tirelessly. However, the high achieving people pleaser will tend to do so anyway, because external-facing achievement means an opportunity for something they rarely give to themselves… validation. Thus, they are often unknowingly seeking external validation in this process, in order to evaluate the worthiness of their achievement. When external validation is unlikely, unavailable, or not even part of the process, this above-described approach for “achievement” of a goal isn’t as typically present. In this case, the high achiever may not even pursue the goal, may not consider it important, or may put it off incessantly in favor of other tasks that are deemed a higher priority (e.g., other goals where external evaluation are likely to be present). So What About Personal Goals? This is the most important question here. We know how high achieving people pleasers typically go about “achievement” goals that are external-facing, but what about personal goals? This is where we get to our “#1 thing” that keeps them from pursuing their goals. When my high achieving people pleasers typically try to apply the same achievement-logic to their personal goals, it sort of falls flat. They don’t have the same sense of urgency toward fulfilling their personal goals. This is because they don’t pair reinforcement to their goals, so they don’t feel as drawn toward making space for them. In the case of achievement, the reinforcement is often external validation (or, avoidance of negative feedback). In the case of personal goals, the reinforcement is…? The end goal itself? Self-validation? Fulfillment? But if we haven’t built a runway for these things to be meaningful to us, and if we haven’t allowed ourselves to be “good enough” or worthy enough to have them in the first place, then these goals certainly won’t be meaningful to us when it comes time to put our personal goals on the front burner. We won’t know what to do with them. This means that, the #1 challenge (barrier) to staying focused on personal goals is giving them the same time, space, and energy we do our achievement goals. This is maintained by the root problem (a much deeper issue) of seeking external validation to establish our worth, and struggling with self-validation and worthiness. How Do I Get Out of My Own Way? The short answer is: DO IT ANYWAY. No matter what you think about yourself, what you think about how you’ll be perceived, what you think about your own shortcomings, what’s available
You Can Have Your Goals, OR You Can Have People Pleasing & Perfectionism (But You Can’t Have Both)
Too many of my clients are too worried about the “uncontrollables” in their life. These “uncontrollables” are aspects of their external world that they attempt to control or manage, and actively believe that they can exert control over. When they are in this space, they tend to focus on: What people think about them “Making everyone happy” Finding the “perfect” way to do something “Preparing for every possible scenario” Waiting “for the right time” So on and so forth This then leads to: Spending excessive time preparing for things that are never used, not important, or arbitrary Starting projects and not finishing them Burning themselves out trying to spend more time on their tasks than is logically available in their day, trying to “do it all” Feeling unappreciated when others don’t notice how much time and energy they have spent in something Struggling to set boundaries within themselves and with others Feeling affected by someone’s dislike of their work Continuing to tweak projects endlessly -OR- Conversely, not doing anything at all! These are just some of the many ways that people pleasing x perfectionism can show up in someone’s life. People often engage in these behaviors in an effort to make things “perfect” before they let others see, analyze, and have the opportunity to reject their work. It also protects them from the rejection they do of themselves; when they are holding themselves up to rigid or unrealistic expectations, they are being harshly critical of (and often unintentionally unkind to) themselves. These are fairly fear-based ways to set personal expectations of oneself. The irony? Nothing happens to their goals! They spent so much time on the uncontrollables, that they forgot to master their efficiency in the things they CAN control. In doing so, the gap between themselves and their goals increases, because they have put time and distance between themselves and their goals with this waiting game. And this is if they even have set and measurable goals for their progress. Honestly, most of my perfectionists and people pleasers do not. If they do have goals, they are often unattainable, unreasonable, and self-sabotaging. Most believe that perfect project execution is the goal, other people being proud of them is the goal, being seen as competent and unfailing in every task is the goal, and doing great (no, wonderful!) work at all times is the ultimate goal. Ah! When people approach loose and unmeasurable goals this way, it begs so many more questions than it can possibly answer. How would one measure this? How would one measure success? Failure? If one person doesn’t like it, then are you (as a person) a complete failure, or just your project (and is that a complete failure or a partial failure)? What if your boss, Sally, is just mean and will never be proud of you – will you then never be “good enough”? What if the CEO has expectations that defy the logic of the time-space continuum and what human people are capable of doing – are you still a failure if you cannot meet such toxic and unreasonable demands? This keeps my clients in a feedback loop of rumination, stress, and constant questioning of their worthiness and inherent worth as a person. When really, what we want to do is evaluate the completion on a discrete task, project, or goal. One is about a person, the other is about a task. These are very different things. But what if they worked toward their goal with (a) measurable and operationalized metrics, and (b) a steady, reasonable, and pragmatic pace in mind? What would change? Let’s start with what’s considered “reasonable.” As a starting point, let’s consider a goal of making 1% progress every day on a specific task/goal, and let’s assume you are currently at a baseline of 0% on this task/goal. One percent doesn’t seem like a lot, does it? If we only made 1% progress expected every day on a task or goal, in 30 days they are 30% closer! Even if our execution was not perfect, we would still be ⅓ of the way closer to goal completion by the end of 30 days (on whatever it is we are working on). In 3.5 months, we would be fully completing this goal. (This is, obviously, extremely hypothetical and not applicable to all situations). However, that’s a pretty big gain on a goal, and not likely reflective of the high level of growth that we likely can expect in most circumstances. A lot of this has to do with sustainability (e.g., do you actually have the time each day to do what it would demand to complete 1% of a project/goal every day?) as well as growth incubation periods that exist with many goals (e.g., growing muscle in a fitness program, growing your financial portfolios, or even in things like significantly increasing your networking relationships takes time to address that can’t be bypassed). (Isn’t that crazy, that we have to think even smaller, in order to make bigger, sustainable goals STICK?!). For some people, they can only get 0.1% closer each day; that’s totally okay, too! In fact, in many instances, this might even be advisable to think about it this way. In this scenario, In 10 days, they are 1% closer to their goal. In 10 weeks, they are 10% closer. And in 10 months, they can be 40% closer! That’s 40 percent closer to their goal in ten months!! What if someone is really, really strapped for time and effort. What if they only can work toward 0.05% closer to their goal each day? That’s still: 0.5% closer in 10 days, 5% closer in 5 weeks, and 20% closer in 10 months! It’s kind of crazy to think about it this way, but some goals benefit from this strategy. For example, take long-term goals, such as retirement. With our retirement funds, we do exactly this. If you are planning a retirement fund in the multi-millions, chances are you are saving <0.0001% per day. For